By Anna Von Reitz
Stupidity is what happens when, for whatever reason, a living person fails to engage normal powers of observation and logic and discernment. I once knew a man who was stupid about math. Not because he was mentally deficient or incapable, but because of his prejudice against math. He didn't like it. He wouldn't learn it. Nothing would convince him otherwise. And that was that. Until he got a job he loved and he had to know calculus. Then, magically, he sat down and conquered Advanced Algebra and Calculus in less than three months. He stopped being stupid. He engaged his brain, his powers of observation, and his ability to discern truth.
One of our former California Assembly Members, Kim Cooper, is stupid-- and I told her so, so that is what she holds against me. Her pride. And she is just proving me right again. Unfortunately, she exhibits characteristics that are common today. Her indoctrination and the brain-washing behind it was so strong that a woman who is otherwise not mentally deficient in any way, could not comprehend basic concepts outside the framework of her basic indoctrination received as a child. Like the man who wouldn't learn math, Kim wouldn't learn history, law, or much of anything else from any perspective outside her indoctrination. She struggled and struggled and I kept speaking in plain English until one day, I lost patience and said something like, "Well, you're being stupid....that's why you can't understand this." She was highly offended and hurt, but she didn't understand that I wasn't insulting her basic intelligence. I was commenting on her level of Indoctrination.
So now she is running around trying to collect what she considers to be "facts" and then, she is interpreting those "facts" according to her skewed and crippled worldview and spewing them out to anyone who will listen, claiming all sorts of ignorant things about me and about my work, which she never understood in the first place.
Kim claims that I had an agreement with an "older man" concerning my house. I had no "agreement" with any older man concerning my house. I learned that the Municipal Government's "land description" of my land had been sold at a purported tax sale five years ago just a few days prior to their phony DISTRICT COURT action against a non-existent British Crown franchise operating under the name "Anna M Riezinger - Von Reitz" and a Municipal franchise doing business as "ANNA M RIEZINGER - VON REITZ"
Have any of you ever seen me use that name? No, because it's not my name and I don't recognize it. My name, officially, is Anna Maria Riezinger -- only, and I went to court to make sure that is a matter of their own public record. My pen name is Anna von Reitz and I nailed that down separately, too.
Anna M Riezinger-Von Reitz is a "similar name" Daniel Applegate invented and used to promote False Claims in Commerce and illegal latching (salvage under False Pretenses). In a true Court of Law the use of a middle initial invalidates any claim or cause, simply because it is void for vagueness. Even worse, the use of a letter (M) inserted in a name --- which is what they did -- without any period following to indicate the presence of a name beginning with "M" that has been abbreviated, which is also what they did, renders the whole thing gobbledygook. But we are not dealing with or in a true Court of Law. We are dealing with a private bill collection agency, a franchise corporation, calling itself a "court" ---- "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ANCHORAGE ALASKA" (INCORPORATED).
Do I live in a corporation called ANCHORAGE ALASKA? No. Do I live in a corporation called MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH? No. Do I live in a Municipality called ANCHORAGE? No. Do I live in a city called Anchorage? No. Do I live in "the State of Alaska"(Incorporated)? No. Or any franchise of the State of Alaska, Incorporated, called "Matanuska-Susitna County (Incorporated)"? No. Do I live in a corporation called ALASKA? No. Am I a Federal Employee or the Dependent of a Federal Employee? No. Does Uncle Sam send me a paycheck? No. Do I have any "Federal Income"? No. Do I have any foreign property held in a land trust? No. Do I owe any obligation to the British Crown? No. Do I owe any obligation to the Holy Roman Empire? No. Do I owe their courts any service? No. Do their courts have any right or reason to address me as if I owed them foreign taxes? No. Do their courts or franchises have any right to attach a foreign land description or title to my land? No. Have I ever signed or otherwise obligated myself to pay for any obligations established by "The Constitution of the State of Alaska" or the "State of Alaska Constitution"? No -no American acting as an American ever voted on or ratified this variously named "Constitution"; it was created, voted on, and ratified by Federal Employees living in Alaska and average Americans were not allowed to vote on it at all, then or now. Has their Sixteenth Amendment to their corporation's similarly named "constitution", "The Constitution of the United States of America (Incorporated)" ever been ratified by the States of the Union? No. Is Alaska a State of the Union? Yes, since October 1st 2020, and retroactively to January 3rd 1959.
I have never been a "citizen of the United States" and so, not being a Municipal citizen, I never voluntarily attached any Municipal land descriptions to my land and never owed any Municipal taxes, either. And I am on the Public Records of both parent corporations and the Third Judicial District making it very clear what my name actually is, the nature of my land claims, and my status as a peaceful non-citizen Wisconsinite. So Daniel Applegate and the "State of Alaska (Inc.) and the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH (INC.) all knew my correct name and how to get in contact with me, and never did; they all deliberately misaddressed me and have no excuse for it.
Everything that Kim Cooper alleges and claims to be true about me and my land and my situation and the courts and Daniel Applegate and Hunter Aki simply aren't true. These mental meanderings are the product of her indoctrination; she's being stupid again.
I am continuing the fight to collapse the whole British Crown system that Mr. Applegate works for, and am holding all these "COURTS" and banks accountable. Just as I have told everyone --- we can expend all our effort trying to put out brush fires and fighting bogus issues in their courts --- or we can go after the arsonists. I long ago chose to go after the arsonists, even if it is my own property and reputation being targeted by these Vermin.
Kim has announced with much fanfare that "ANNA HAS NEVER FILED ANY PAPERWORK WITH THE COURTS"----- So WHY, exactly, would I file any paperwork with THEIR courts? I purposely filed no paperwork and put in no appearance as "Anna M Riezinger -Von Reitz" or "ANNA M RIEZINGER -VON REITZ" either one. Why would I get caught up in fighting brush fires, when I have advised everyone else to go after the arsonists instead? Do you think I am joking? Or that I am a hypocrite? Of course, I haven't filed in their courts. I am not a fool. I deny any authority to their courts. I deny any jurisdiction to their courts. And the Burden of Proof that I ever owed them or their franchises operations as much as the sweat from my nose --- is on them, and still waiting to be demonstrated.
I may have been victimized by criminals pretending to have authority --- private police officers (Pinkertons) impersonating American public peacekeepers, but that is no different than anyone being accosted by groups of thugs or gangs on the street. Crips and Bloods have the same exact legal standing as State of Alaska Troopers, and the fact that the Troopers wouldn't believe me doesn't change that. The gangs have their colors and the Troopers have their uniforms. They are both engaged in assault with deadly weapons and armed robbery, it's just that the State of Alaska Troopers acting as Municipal Government Employees are acting under "color of law" --- the Crips and Bloods just do what they do without pretense.
The gangs are actually more honest.
Kim Cooper literally and repeatedly asked me the same questions and was not listening to the answers. She kept lapsing back into her own interpretations --- and I encouraged her to not do what stupid people do with new information ---- so she got mad and made more "stupid" interpretations. She has basically made all these conjectures about me and about reality, based on whatever she thought was gossip-worthy and according to whatever fit into her pre-existing indoctrination. She doesn't know what she doesn't know, and is stubborn in refusing to learn otherwise.
That's what I call stupid --- but please note that stupidity can be caused by many things unrelated to mental deficiency. Fear regularly renders bright people stupid. Habitual unexamined assumptions render people stupid all the time. Laziness can cause stupidity. Being startled can cause stupidity. Yes, simply being startled by an unfamiliar idea or insight can cause stupidity and often does. We have a built in cognition error that rejects new information, so you can't trust your basic reactions. If you don't want to be stupid, you have to "open your mind" and really grapple with new facts.
Kim Cooper did research my family roots in America, and found out that yes, I qualify as a Daughter of the American Revolution, if I want to pay $400 and go through the drill to join -- an option I haven't chosen, though I am grateful to her for her time and effort.
As for Kevin Annett, I criticized his work because it suddenly got very lopsided and there was no explanation why. He started out criticizing unexplained deaths and disappearances at his own church's residential schools --- Anglican, I think, a Protestant Church where he was a Clergyman --- and all of a sudden, he focused entirely on the Catholic Church instead. Hello? Is murder and abuse of children suddenly okay when Protestants do it? I wanted an answer. His focus made no sense to me. If you are going after crime, go after the crime.
What had happened was that in the interim, Kevin had discovered the source of the evil, had discovered it was institutionalized, and had turned his attention to that. That's all Kevin Annett ever had to explain to get my support, but I was not inclined to blindly support another Protestant-Catholic fight, when both were and had been accused of the same crime(s). I have supported him (look at the articles attached to his name) ever since he came clean about that part of it.
More stupidity. A Declaration is a diplomatic instrument and no, it is not directly impactful in any "District Court" or "DISTRICT COURT". It does, however, impact nationality, when a choice of nationality is at issue and when which form of law applies is at issue and also citizenship obligations --- like paying foreign taxes --- is at issue.
The only Americans who owe Federal Taxes, including property taxes, are Federal Employees or their direct dependents. Just like Spaniards don't owe Irish taxes. A Wisconsinite does not owe British Territorial taxes. A Wisconsinite does not owe Municipal taxes levied against "citizens of the United States", either.
Over 400 "federal" judges thus far have lost their jobs because of me; I am proud of that fact and I am coming for all of them that don't abide by and honor their service contracts, including the one that "processed" the case against my "presumed name". So who is laughing now? I want all the "district" courts now operating in the States of the Union returned to the District of Columbia where District Courts (and even more so, DISTRICT COURTS) belong.
That's what I am spending my time doing, for my own sake and everyone else's.
So that "stupid" people can finally see that, oh, it's official --- district courts don't belong in our states.
Period. At all.
Just ask yourselves --- do these government employees work for us, or do we work for them? If they don't work for us (they don't) who do they work for? Answer: the Pope and the British Monarch. So what are employees (whether they were born in America or not) of the Pope and the British Monarch doing here, swaggering around our States and telling us what to do, imposing their taxes on us, and impersonating us as if we were literally corporation franchises?
I will tell you what they are doing. They are committing crimes against us. They are impersonating us and are unlawfully, illegally and immorally subjecting us to foreign laws and foreign taxes, and illegally confiscating our assets for their own benefit. They are illegally occupying our country as mercenaries under color and pretense of law.
So, when I tell you that Kim Cooper is stupid, just as I told her, it isn't meant as an insult. It's meant as a comment on an ingrained mentality and unwillingness to face facts --- an indoctrination that is leading people to put up with institutionalized criminality and pretend that it is "justice".
As for the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service, both are foreign private bill collection agencies working for the Pope (IRS) and the British Crown (Internal Revenue Service) and the only people they are supposed to be collecting from are, again, Government Workers, Federal Employees, Federal Franchise Employees. If you don't get a check from Uncle Sam, they aren't supposed to say "Boo!" to you, and you have, demonstrably, no "federal income".
But just like the foreign judges, they have been allowed to run rampant, too.
Daniel Applegate, the Junior Woodchuck "Agent" from DOJ, made the presumption that "Anna M Riezinger-Von Reitz" was a Federal Employee/British Crown Franchise known as an "Individual" and that this Legal Fiction was in some way connected to me and to my assets, but, if Kim wants to grow a brain -- Mr. Applegate is either (1) no longer employed or (2) slated for removal, and he will be laughing as hard as those 400 "federal" judges.
I know who I am, and I know that I am not a Brit, not a Papist, not a Federal Employee, not a Federal Employee's Dependent, not any fictional corporation franchise named "Anna M Riezinger-Von Reitz", and not accepting any allegation otherwise. I am not a citizen and have no citizenship obligations. And that includes no foreign tax obligations.
Sooner or later, the truth always comes home, and God's Truth is coming home in this country right now.
When I told Kim Cooper that the Sixteenth Amendment to their Corporation's "Constitution" was never ratified by the States of the Union, she just stared and blinked like I was speaking fast and fluent Portuguese. This is what I mean by "stupid" --- the information is true, it's there, it's stated in plain English, but the person continues to stare at you with a blank expression. They are able to understand what you just told them. They could, if they applied themselves, look it up for themselves, and many people have done so, but those rendered stupid by cognitive dissonance react like bumpers in a pinball machine. The information goes in and bounces right back out. They don't control that automatic rejection reaction long enough to take in new information.
If the States of the Union didn't ratify this "Amendment" it is self-evidently not an Amendment to any Constitution that Americans are party to or obligated to obey.
And that turns out to be the case. The Corporation calling itself "The United States of America" (Incorporated) published a look-alike corporate "Constitution" for another corporation calling itself "the United States of America" (Incorporated) in 1868. They published it with no explanation or disclosure. At the time, people looked at it and said, "What's this? We already know what the Constitutions say....." By failing to disclose that it was a different kind of "Constitution" for a foreign corporation merely calling itself by two different similar names mirroring American unincorporated businesses, the Perpetrators committed deliberate self-interested constructive fraud -- a scheme known as "mirroring" -- in Breach of Trust and Bad Faith against their American Employers, and that fraud remains actionable today, and diplomatic action is precisely what I have taken and am taking.
To be specific, Scotland is responsible for "The United States of America (Incorporated)" registered in Scotland in 1868, which was the publisher of "The Constitution of the United States of America (Incorporated)" and which applied to another foreign corporation, the "United States of America (Incorporated)" that was registered in the British Territorial "State of Delaware" and in the British Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico.
The rest of the Americans aren't stupid. We have merely been misinformed and denied disclosure that is and was always required to justify any claim of commercial acceptance or accommodation in trade. As the Roman Civil Law maintains by Maxim --- "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived." -- but when fraud --- especially fraud of this duration and magnitude is discovered, all bets are off and all debts come due to the Perpetrators.
This is why, ultimately, Daniel Applegate, a British Esquire, owes me, a Wisconsinite, his corporation, his body, his "national" trust, the entire debt of the USA, his home, his land, his labor, his "good faith service" and ironically, his protection of my "persons" (see Article IV).
What he is doing and what Brits and Roman Municipal Corporation employees have been doing for decades, is making up a fake name similar or even identical to mine, attaching claims of indebtedness to this other name and person, and then suing me for payment and illegally confiscating my assets if I don't pay. In the jurisdiction of the sea, this is called "illegal latching"--- because they use the phony made-up name and presumed-to-exist person -- to latch onto actual people and actual assets. In the jurisdiction of the land this is called "illegal takings" and is strictly forbidden by our actual service contract with the Brits, The Constitution of the United States of America.
Here's the irritating thing. The Brits and the Holy Romans have claimed to be our caretakers and trustees without telling the American people a single word about this, and they have been busily managing everything "for" us, according to their advantage and their tastes and according to their values and beliefs --- and although we don't agree with them on virtually anything and have not ever authorized these presumptions or even been made aware of them until Karen Hudes informed us that our government was "in interregnum" so far as the rest of the world knew --- we do owe them for the "enumerated services" that go with the "enumerated powers".
We owe them for that, and they haven't been able to collect from our States of the Union because they weren't in Session for a very, very long time. What we owe them, however, is miniscule in comparison to what they owe us.
The idea of debt swapping was published as a remedy for this situation -- in Federal Title XII (12) -- and is known as a "Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Exemption", but then, the Brits, true to form, failed to follow through and create a program and make it accessible to the American Public. Parliament dumped it on the United States Secretary of State, and there it sat. As a result, there was no effective way to offset their "National Debt" (which is owed to us) via debt swaps, and no way for us to pay them directly, either, because they removed gold and silver certificates from circulation. Failure to implement the debt swaps meant their debts to us could only increase, and taking away our means to pay any debts directly, were free will choices on their part --- in effect, they refused payment.
This meant the accrual of a constantly increasing run-away "National Debt" owed by our Federal Subcontractors and their similarly-named corporations. It also means that they owe an astronomical amount of "Interest" on their "National Debt".
Here's the rub: they have been guaranteeing their National Debt --- not just the portion we legitimately owed them --- on our purloined assets and charging us for both all their debts and the interest on their debts. Of course, they never told us a word about this cozy accommodation.
In order to finance this, they had to keep registering more and more Americans (without telling the Americans what they were doing) as British Territorial U.S. Citizens. When they misidentified us as British Subjects, they had an excuse for seizing upon the victim's assets, for example, putting the clueless American's land and other assets into British Land Trusts, and Roman Municipal Intellectual Assets Trusts, where they could be used as collateral for British Crown borrowing and investments. It was, in effect, a forced and institutionalized foreign Ponzi Scheme on American soil. The registration of more and more American babies as British Territorial "U.S. Citizens" at the bottom of the pyramid transferred more and more American assets to the British Crown and gave unlimited borrowing power to those at the top of the pyramid scheme -- the members of the U.S. Congress. And then the Holy Romans came in for their 60% share.
Eventually, both Federal Subcontractors got in the Act, and they created a jointly managed Double Dipping Scheme, by which both parent corporations got paid for providing the same service--- and sometimes we paid for the same service three times. That's why there's a Department of Labor and a DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and a DOL.
All these False Identities being attached to Americans also provided endless ability to launder money, which is what the IRS and Internal Revenue Service do by creating entire False Life Narratives for the legal fiction "persons" these Federal Subcontractors have created and named after actual Americans. According to them, Anna Maria Riezinger was manager of a gin distillery in Barbados (that's their Legal Fiction British Subject using my actual Given Name); according to me, Anna Maria Riezinger was, at the same moment, living in Big Lake, Alaska, full time, and had nothing going on in Barbados.
Guess which version of reality is true?
This fraudulent ability to have multiple "persons" functioning in multiple locations --- British Subjects, Roman Municipal subjects, even "Special Purpose Vehicles" named after Americans and functioning as franchises of the Department of Transportation --- all under the same name or a name very similar to the name of an actual American --- gave them unprecedented ability to launder money and evade their own taxes and debts, and slough their operational costs onto their American victims.
I have never received a paycheck from Uncle Sam, yet I have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in "Federal Income Taxes" and franchise taxes -- foreign property taxes, sales taxes, utility taxes, sin taxes on liquor, and taxes on taxes.
Gold owed to the actual American named Anna Maria Riezinger, is transferred offshore to an account belonging to Anna Maria Riezinger, a British Subject living on a British Territorial Island like Puerto Rico or Barbados, from there, the gold gets traded for the local national currency or into Federal Reserve Notes, that are used as payola to buy off local participants in the Great Fraud. The actual gold and silver belonging to America has been stolen and used in exactly this way by successive foreign political Administrations.
Many people watched me cash in a Silver Bearer Bond and return it to our American Treasury, live on YouTube. That Bearer Bond came from a box of such bonds issued against American-owned silver. Those boxes were given away by various Administrations to individual officers in foreign governments to buy those officers off and ensure their cooperation with whatever the Bosses in this country wanted. Those bonds, representing a claim and obligation against our silver, were never authorized by us.
So now, the original Anna Maria Riezinger has suffered the loss of her gold, a foreign Legal Fiction named after her has "inherited" the benefit of that gold and has converted it into local domestic currency held in an account under her name, and the local government then taxes this "income" under an income tax scheme.
This sleight of hand has also allowed their foreign British Territorial and Municipal "courts" to misaddress the actual American named Anna Maria Riezinger as if she was the "Anna Maria Riezinger" they "accidentally-on-purpose" registered as a British Subject and U.S. Citizen. Just "mistake" one for the other. Like "mistaking" a U.S. Citizen called "Anna M Riezinger - Von Reitz" for Anna Maria Riezinger, a Wisconsinite.
Substituting one person for another, especially replacing the identity of a living person with a corporation of the same name, is a crime generally known as "impersonation". When this crime is institutionalized and used to illegally confiscate assets or secretly use assets belonging to a living man as collateral to pay foreign debt or extend foreign credit, it's a crime called "aggravated impersonation". These are crimes that the British Crown Corporation and its franchises as well as the (Holy) Roman Municipal Corporations have been committing -- with wanton abandon for almost a century -- and not just in this country.
Kim also claimed that anyone putting Federal Reserve Notes in the Vault program was just making a "donation" and would never see their money returned.
Well, guess what, America? The "real skinny" is what I have been telling you for years now. According to the same Federal Judges that Kim invokes as her God, Federal Reserve Notes have merely symbolic value, and if you stole ten trainloads of them, you could not be accused of theft. That much is true. And there is no intention, generally speaking, to ever return any deposited Federal Reserve Notes --- which are worthless, literally --- to anyone. Our stated intention is to return gold-backed American money, American Federation Dollars, instead of Federal Reserve Notes. So you are donating something that is worthless and getting more worthless by the day, in order to exchange these poker chips for actual money that is worth something ---- as it turns out, it's worth the greater part of the buying power that Americans lost between 1913 and today. So, instead of being rooked, totally, by the Federal Reserve and the political parties that have been running this country like a casino, you stand to get back buying power lost to inflation ever since 1913. The Vault is a mini-Hedge Fund because the value of our AFD goes up as the merely perceived "value" of the Federal Reserve Note goes down. And that's not a Ponzi Scheme. That's exchange rate economics.
So once again, the idea that the Federal Reserve Note is valuable and that we would want to steal it or anything like that, is stupid. The amazing part is that anyone would want to repair your losses and give you back buying power that was slowly, deliberately, viciously extracted from you, your parents, your grandparents, and your great-grandparents.
Faced with the enormity of the fraud and the theft and the violence that has been practiced against us all by these foreign Federal Subcontractors, it is also amazing that Americans are not tarring, feathering, and drop-kicking Liars like Daniel Applegate and his fellow members of the Bar Associations who have been hired --for a cut of the take -- to operate these phony foreign "courts" -- and to asset strip this country and its people for the benefit of the British Crown and Roman Municipal Corporations involved in this gigantic international crime practiced under color of law.
Remain patient a little while longer, being gentle as doves and wise as serpents. The Truth is setting you free -- maybe not as fast as you'd like, but doing the job nonetheless.
As for Kim Cooper and everyone else who thinks that I am the problem, stop being stupid. Engage the information and your brain. I didn't exchange your silver for paper, then purposefully siphon away the "value" of the paper for a hundred years. I didn't move your gold offshore for "safekeeping" and then spend it. I didn't pretend to be you, run up a bunch of debt against your credit, and leave you to pay the bill. No, I'm afraid it was the Federal Subcontractors, including all the Esquires in the Bar Associations, that are supposed to be providing us all with "good faith service" --- who did all that. And more.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
June 27th 2026
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
GOSPEL (Matt. V. 20-24.) At that time, Jesus said to his disciples: Except your justice abound more than that of the Scribesand Pharisees, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not kill: and whosoever shall kill, shall be in danger of the judgment. But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. If therefore, thou bring thy gift at the altar, and there thou remember that thy brother bath anything against thee, leave there thy offering befog a the altar, and go first to be reconciled to thy brother: and then coming, thou shaft offer thy gift.
“May God console you! ... What saddens you ... is the fact that others have occupied the Churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises -- but you have the apostolic faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the faith? The true faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in this struggle -- the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the faith? 
